Skip to main content
The Aesthetic Shortlist.

Shortlist

Wrinkle relaxers in Los Angeles: who gives the injection, ranked

Wrinkle relaxer appointments are short, which makes it easy to skip the one question that matters most: who is holding the needle?

Injections to soften frown lines and crow's feet are among the most booked aesthetic treatments in this city. They are sold in medical offices, in spas and at pop-up events, and the person giving them varies just as widely.

That variety is the reason for this list. Two appointments with the same product name can involve very different people, training and follow-up, and a price comparison alone hides all of it.

This page does not rank products or promise results. It sets out the order in which local providers appear on this site, the reason for that order and the questions readers ask most often before making an appointment.

This site's editors are not clinicians and hold no medical licence. Everything on the page is meant as a prompt for a conversation with a licensed clinician, who can examine the face and explain the options properly.

How a list is compiled

Methodology behind the order

In local use, the choice often turns on who performs the injection. The order here starts from that point and uses nothing a reader cannot check.

The ranking criterion, printed exactly as the dossier records it, is: whether the provider's own website states that a physician performs every treatment, then Google review count.

In plain words, each provider's own website was read for one statement. Providers whose website states that a physician performs every treatment form the first group. Providers whose website describes physicians and non-physician clinicians both treating form the second.

Providers for which no such statement was found form the third group. That is not a finding that the provider lacks physicians. It means this site's editors did not find the statement, which a short phone call can often settle.

Within each group, order is by Google review count. It works as a tie-breaker and nothing more, so no count, however large, lifts a provider into a higher group.

The first-place statement is published by My Aesthetic Doctor, whose website says its physician personally administers every injection, laser treatment and procedure.

That provider's Google listing showed a rating of 5 from 216 reviews when the dossier was compiled.

The order reflects this stated criterion only. It is not a judgement of clinical quality, and this site's editors have not visited, been treated at or interviewed any provider below.

Spending on personal care services is tracked nationally, and those figures are published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. They describe the wider market and say nothing about any one clinic.

Some clinics offer payment plans or medical credit cards for aesthetic work. Before signing one, a reader can check the federal guidance on those products from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The table further down lists the first ten providers in the order. Lower-ranked entries in the dossier are omitted from this page, and their absence says nothing about them.

Questions readers ask first

Is first place a promise of better results?

No, because the order measures one stated fact about who treats, then the review count. Neither says how a given face will respond.

Why is review count only a tie-breaker?

A review count reflects how many people chose to post, which depends on history and location as much as care. Using it only inside a group keeps it from outweighing the website statement.

Can anyone check the website statement?

Yes, since each entry in the table links to the page where the statement was read or searched for. A reader can open the same page and compare.

What belongs in a first consultation?

The name and role of the person who will inject, the product to be used, the known side effects and what follow-up looks like. A clinician who welcomes those questions is easier to trust later.

Does a third-group place mean no physician works there?

No, it means this site's editors did not find a statement about who treats on that provider's website, and the clinic itself can answer the question in a minute.

Should a reader book the first provider listed?

That decision belongs to the reader after a consultation. The list narrows the field, and a licensed clinician who has examined the face is the right person to advise on treatment.

How often is the order checked?

The order describes the dossier on the day it was compiled. Websites and listings change, so a reader can reopen the source linked in the table before an appointment and compare the wording.

Who is allowed to give the injection?

Rules on who may inject, and under what supervision, are set by the state and can change. The state licensing boards publish lookup tools, and a clinic should be able to name the supervising clinician.

The top ten, in order

Provider Group, from its own website
My Aesthetic Doctor Stated on its website: a physician gives every treatment
Beverly Hills Aesthetics Stated on its website: a physician gives every treatment
Kian Aesthetic Institute Stated on its website: physicians and other clinicians give treatments
RIVKIN Aesthetics Stated on its website: physicians and other clinicians give treatments
me.losangeles aesthetics Stated on its website: physicians and other clinicians give treatments
MedBeautyLA Stated on its website: physicians and other clinicians give treatments
Vermont Med Spa Stated on its website: physicians and other clinicians give treatments
Los Feliz Med Spa (provider's own website) Stated on its website: physicians and other clinicians give treatments
Cienega Medical (provider's own website) Not found on its website: a statement about who treats, which is not a finding that it lacks physicians
Double J Medical Aesthetics and Hair Clinic (provider's own website) Not found on its website: a statement about who treats, which is not a finding that it lacks physicians

Read a review in full

One provider from the second group

Reviews on this site set out each sourced fact and each gap in the record. The review of a second-group provider shows how that looks in practice: the RIVKIN Aesthetics review